<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cloudiness &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cloudiness.com/category/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cloudiness.com</link>
	<description>Just like the old cloudiness, but bloggier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:54:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google’s Nexus One muzzles the foul-mouthed</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudiness.com/2010/01/23/found/google%e2%80%99s-nexus-one-muzzles-the-foul-mouthed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudiness.com/2010/01/23/found/google%e2%80%99s-nexus-one-muzzles-the-foul-mouthed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Found]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudiness.com/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While they&#8217;re at it, why not use &#8220;fudge&#8221;, &#8220;darn&#8221;, and &#8220;shucks&#8221; instead of replacing the offending words with hash symbols?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While they&#8217;re at it, why not use &#8220;fudge&#8221;, &#8220;darn&#8221;, and &#8220;shucks&#8221; instead of replacing the offending words with hash symbols?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudiness.com/2010/01/23/found/google%e2%80%99s-nexus-one-muzzles-the-foul-mouthed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser size</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/12/17/found/browser-size/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/12/17/found/browser-size/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Found]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudiness.com/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting graphic showing you how much viewport area (where the web content is, between the scrollbars, toolbars, and so on) web users see. Made useful because you can load your own websites in for comparison. It&#8217;s worth remembering there is no page fold because every web browser is capable of scrolling and every web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting graphic showing you how much viewport area (where the web content is, between the scrollbars, toolbars, and so on) web users see. Made useful because you can load your own websites in for comparison.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth remembering <a title="There Is No Page Fold" href="http://www.thereisnopagefold.com/">there is no page fold</a> because every web browser is capable of scrolling and every web user knows how to scroll. Google has provided a guide for where to put the most important information and action elements on the page, not a guide for how short and narrow to make your web pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/12/17/found/browser-size/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave Keyboard Shortcuts</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/10/24/found/google-wave-keyboard-shortcuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/10/24/found/google-wave-keyboard-shortcuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Found]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudiness.com/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d figured out a couple of these on my own, but this is a handy reference. Otherwise, the Wave interface has you moving from keyboard to mouse and back an awful lot. Unlike GMail, which could be used to communicate with anybody with an email address, Wave&#8217;s usefulness is relevant to the number of people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d figured out a couple of these on my own, but this is a handy reference. Otherwise, the Wave interface has you moving from keyboard to mouse and back an awful lot.</p>
<p>Unlike GMail, which could be used to communicate with anybody with an email address, Wave&#8217;s usefulness is relevant to the number of people you want to use it with. But even with a fairly limited range of acquaintances signed up, it&#8217;s already surprisingly useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/10/24/found/google-wave-keyboard-shortcuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s next after SpamWaves, WavePorn?</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/10/20/found/whats-next-after-spamwaves-waveporn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/10/20/found/whats-next-after-spamwaves-waveporn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Found]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudiness.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Wave already has its first reported spammer &#8212; a marketer for POM Wonderful began flinging flack at all the food bloggers they could find on Wave. Although at least a couple people are optimistic about Google&#8217;s technical capacity to keep spam under control in Wave, it&#8217;s ultimately impossible to prevent spamming entirely in any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Wave already has its first reported spammer &#8212; a marketer for POM Wonderful began flinging flack at all the food bloggers they could find on Wave.</p>
<p>Although at least <a title="Stygma: Google Wave and Spam: Do I have permission to Wave at you?" href="http://stygma.com/index.php/2009/do-i-have-permission-to-wave-at-you/">a couple people are optimistic</a> about Google&#8217;s technical capacity to keep spam under control in Wave, it&#8217;s ultimately impossible to prevent spamming entirely in any medium without either proactive moderation or closing account creation and forbidding user interaction.</p>
<p>Incidentally, if you want to find me on Wave, ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/10/20/found/whats-next-after-spamwaves-waveporn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t we figure out what Google Wave is good for?</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/10/19/web/why-cant-we-figure-out-what-google-wave-is-good-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/10/19/web/why-cant-we-figure-out-what-google-wave-is-good-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudiness.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Wave is&#8230; something. What it is, exactly, few people have been able to agree on. Google&#8217;s own PR about Google Wave is a frustratingly imbalanced information overload, their publicity effort centering around an 80 minute video of the developer preview at Google I/O, earlier this year, entirely burying their slick, short product demos. Apple can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Wave is&#8230; something. What it is, exactly, few people have been able to agree on. Google&#8217;s own PR about Google Wave is a frustratingly imbalanced information overload, their publicity effort centering around an <a title="YouTube: Google Wave Developer Preview at Google I/O 2009" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_UyVmITiYQ">80 minute video of the developer preview</a> at Google I/O, earlier this year, entirely burying their slick, short product demos.</p>
<p>Apple can routinely, in 80 minutes, tout its sales figures, announce three revolutionary consumer products, demo them, preview yet another devastatingly witty TV commercial starring an affable PC and bemused Mac, and have a surprise musical guest run through a number or two. Even Microsoft&#8217;s execs can put on a reasonably tight show when announcing new products. So how does Google&#8217;s new product announcement compare? It&#8217;s thorough and boring. It&#8217;s unrehearsed, heavily padded by presentation failures, presenter fumbles, and an excruciatingly long introduction by one of Google&#8217;s research unit executives.</p>
<p>The Wave video is a fine tech conference presentation. But it&#8217;s a lousy public product demonstration, and it&#8217;s the entirety of Google&#8217;s sales pitch. Sales pitches, product sheets, whitepapers, short demonstrations of single features are all missing from Wave&#8217;s PR. In their place is a long video of people fumbling with their demo equipment. I watched it in 20 minute chunks, because if this is The Future, The Future is awkward.</p>
<p><span id="more-244"></span></p>
<p>Wave is new, it&#8217;s exciting, it will replace email, instant messaging, wikis, and be the new unified front-end for everything from blogs to bug trackers, and Google seems to say that if you sit through this unedited speech you are worthy of it. (Those slick demos? Read on.) In a way, this preemptively blames the user for Not Getting It if they&#8217;re disinclined to watch. Google&#8217;s previous Big Idea product at least got a <a title="Welcome to Google Chrome, by Scott McCloud" href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/">comic book</a>.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s in the video? In the first twenty minutes, the front-end demo &#8212; what the average user will care about &#8212; is largely complete. Edit out the two presentation failures, presenter fumfuhs, and the executive&#8217;s appearance and there would be maybe ten minutes of raw video to make a proper demo out of. The remaining hour has some impressive demos, tech talk, and promising peeks into what&#8217;s to come, but the high points all come early.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all great and good to know the full arsenal of capabilities. But maybe not all at once. Especially since the cues for what anyone can get out of it for themselves aren&#8217;t the purpose of the presentation. Google&#8217;s answer to end user questions amounts to, &#8220;When you use it, it will become useful,&#8221; which may be true but lacks any empathy for those who need a rationale besides curiosity to spend time on it. So to fill in the breach, the best what&#8217;s-in-it-for-me pieces are coming from <a title="Daniel Tenner: What problems does Google Wave solve?" href="http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html">elsewhere</a>.</p>
<p>Judging Wave &#8212; and Google&#8217;s attitude toward the public &#8212; by this is a little unfair. But only a little: Wave&#8217;s homepage has a sign-in form, a tagline, a very cluttered screenshot, and the teaser, &#8220;Watch our looooong video&#8221;. The video page spares a hundred words to describe the product and links to two more videos, where you can watch short whiteboard talks about Wave&#8217;s <a title="YouTube: Google Wave: Live collaborative editing" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ykZYKCK7AM">concurrency control</a> and <a title="YouTube: Google Wave: Natural Language Processing" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sx3Fpw0XCXk">natural language processing</a> (shot outdoors, interrupted by boat horns). Shorter, yes, but not a great outreach to users.</p>
<h3>The secret videos</h3>
<p>What Google doesn&#8217;t mention until after you&#8217;ve gotten keys to the kingdom is that the quick demos were available all along. There&#8217;s an <a title="YouTube: Google Wave Overview" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6pgxLaDdQw">eight-minute video</a> conducted by Wave&#8217;s project managers, not slick but considerably easier to digest, and even illustrates features not mentioned in the big announcement.</p>
<p>There are also extremely short walkthroughs of discrete tasks: <a title="YouTube: Google Wave: Reading waves" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mc3D1YVkag">Reading a wave</a>, <a title="YouTube: Starting a new wave" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_zpfGxpKMo">starting a new wave</a>, <a title="YouTube: Google Wave: Adding Contacts" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7f8Nycg3l4">adding contacts</a>, <span style="text-decoration: none;"><a title="YouTube: Google Wave: Playback" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAKfhstqbVk">p</a></span><a title="YouTube: Google Wave: Playback" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAKfhstqbVk">laying back waves</a>, <a title="YouTube: Google Wave: Replying with Shift+Enter " href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=funpKRmGo6A">replying</a>, <a title="YouTube: Google Wave: Moving panels" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0KWnGuw07k">moving panels</a>, <a title="YouTube: Google Wave: Making a folder" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIJjljnL80I">making a folder</a>&#8230; GoogleVideo&#8217;s channel has <a title="YouTube: GoogleVideo's Channel filtered for &quot;wave&quot;" href="http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleVideos#p/search/8/xBzuuWZPaXc">a ton of these</a>. Why they aren&#8217;t being used for Wave&#8217;s promotion is a mystery.</p>
<p>I have a Wave account of my own and will post impressions after experimenting further with friends and coworkers. So far, it takes little poking around or demo-watching to see how useful this is going to be. In the meanwhile, here&#8217;s a <a title="YouTube: Google Wave Cinema: Pulp Fiction" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcxF9oz9Cu0">rapid-fire Wave video</a> (some offensive language is used) which is meant as a joke but doubles as a respectable demo in its own right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudiness.com/2009/10/19/web/why-cant-we-figure-out-what-google-wave-is-good-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

